Grading and Academic Standards
Class Standing
Students are classified by the Registrar’s Office at the beginning of each semester. Class standing is determined as follows:
| Class Standing | Hours |
|---|---|
| Freshman | fewer than 28 |
| Sophomore | 28 to 59 |
| Junior | 60 to 89 |
| Senior | 90 to 124 |
| Fifth Year | More than 124 |
| Graduate | 1 to 65 |
| Special (interest only) | 1 or more |
Grading Information and Transcripts
Grading System
Westminster uses the following grades:
| Letter Grade | Description |
|---|---|
| A, A- | Excellent |
| B+, B, B- | Above Average |
| C+, C, C- | Average |
| D+, D, D- | Poor |
| F | Failure |
| CR | Credit |
| NC | No Credit |
| W | Withdrawn |
| WF | Withdrawn Failing |
| AW | Administrative Withdrawal |
| AU | Audit |
| I | Incomplete |
| T | Temporary |
Grading criteria is established by each faculty member and communicated through the corresponding course syllabus. Grades of NC, W, AU, T, and I yield no credit toward graduation and are not computed in the grade point average. Grades of NC or I may not be used to replace any previous grade for a course.“T” grades are intended to be a short-term, temporary grade to clear the registration for a given term and should only be used for senior projects, graduate or undergraduate thesis work, continuing registration coursework, and internships that require a very short extension only. “T” grades should be resolved and replaced with regular grades within one week of the end of the term. “T” grades are not intended to take the place of an incomplete grade when the student meets the criteria for an incomplete (provided below) and should not be used for regular coursework when the student has failed to take a final examination or turn in final coursework that would otherwise result in a lowered grade. WF grades count as F in GPA calculations.
Grade Points and Grade Point Average
A student’s academic standing is expressed by a grade point average. Grade points are assigned as shown below:
| Letter Grade | Grade Points Per Credit Hour |
|---|---|
| A | 4.0 |
| A- | 3.7 |
| B+ | 3.3 |
| B | 3.0 |
| B- | 2.7 |
| C+ | 2.3 |
| C | 2.0 |
| C- | 1.7 |
| D+ | 1.3 |
| D | 1.0 |
| D- | 0.7 |
| F | 0.0 |
| WF | 0.0 |
Calculating the Grade Point Average
The grade point average (GPA) is determined by dividing the sum of grade points earned by the total number of hours attempted. All hours taken at Westminster are counted except those for which a mark of CR, NC, W, AU, T, or I is recorded. Hours transferred from other academic institutions count for credit only; they do not count in the grade point average.
Grade Changes
Changes to final grades submitted to the Registrar’s Office are only made in the case of instructor error and require the signatures of the instructor, the dean of the appropriate school, and the Provost.
Grade Reports
Grade reports are available on Self-Service at the end of each semester or term. Individual course grade rosters are not posted. Students needing additional copies of grade reports for reimbursement programs or other verifications may obtain additional copies from the Registrar’s Office.
Credit/No Credit Option
Students may elect to take a maximum of two courses on a credit/no credit basis. However, students must earn passing letter grades in courses applied toward their majors or minors. Therefore, if a student chooses to elect credit/no credit on a course that is required in his or her major or minor, the student will need to repeat that course in a future semester. Courses offered only on a credit/no credit basis are excluded from these limitations. Students who declare a major or minor in a given subject after having taken a course in that subject on a credit/no credit basis may be required by their major or minor department to retake the course for a letter grade. Students who take courses credit/no credit must perform work at the level of C- or higher to receive credit. Grades of credit/no credit are not included in GPA calculations.
Incompletes
When extenuating circumstances occur beyond a student’s control, such as medical issues or family emergencies, students can request that faculty assign them an incomplete grade. At the time of request, students should have a passing grade and have completed at least two-thirds of the required course-work. Generally, incomplete grades are not given when the incomplete work includes team-based projects and assignments, although exceptions can be made.
If a faculty member determines an incomplete grade is warranted, all work must be completed by the date specified by the faculty member within 10 weeks after the course has ended. Adjunct faculty members must inform the department chair of the incomplete and devise a plan to assure follow through during the extended period. If the work is not completed by the end of the period specified, the temporary mark is changed to the grade indicated by the instructor, or if no grade has been indicated the mark is changed to an F. When coursework in which a student has received an Incomplete has been made up, the final grade is entered with I and the letter grade (for example, IA).
Alternatives to incomplete grades may include a) students repeating a course to improve the grade and their GPA, or b) filing a petition with the Review Committee for a late withdrawal when the extraordinary circumstances faced by the student are documented and resulted in failing all classes in a term. Faculty members may adopt late assignment rules or more restrictive incomplete policies and are encouraged to articulate those policies on the syllabus.
Note for graduating students: A grade of “I” for any class in a student’s last semester will automatically move them to the next graduating semester.
Ordering Official Transcripts
Specific information for ordering official transcripts may be found on the Registrar’s Office webpage.
Unofficial transcripts for current students are available on the web using Self-Service regardless of outstanding obligations.
Course Audits and Repeats
Auditing Courses
Students may elect to audit courses at Westminster according to the guidelines listed in the Academic Policies and Procedures section of this catalog. Courses that are entered on students’ permanent records as audited (AU) earn no credit and fulfill no requirements.
Repeated Courses
The grade and credit hours for a repeated course are entered into the computation of a student’s grade point average and counted toward graduation only once. That is, the credit hours and grade points cannot be used or counted twice. In the case of repeated courses, the highest grade awarded is used in the calculation of the student’s grade point average and completion of requirements. Repeated course grades on student transcripts are marked by an R in front of the final grade.
Note: Some courses, such as HPW courses and some music courses such as Westminster Chorale, are designated as repeatable courses and are so noted in the individual course descriptions. These courses will count in the hours and the GPA more than one time.
Academic Renewal
After at least one semester’s grades have been posted, a currently enrolled undergraduate student may petition the Registrar in writing for academic renewal. This is a procedure which allows students to request that their academic records be reviewed for the purpose of discounting for grade point average computation all courses bearing grades of D+ or lower and entered on the academic record ten or more calendar years prior to the request. Under this procedure, courses meeting the criteria do not count toward the total hours, upper division hours, or WCore hours needed for graduation. The renewal option can be used only once during a student’s undergraduate career. This procedure does not apply to students pursuing a second undergraduate degree.
Academic Standing, Probation, and Suspension
Good Standing
The academic standing of each undergraduate student is determined by examining records at the end of Fall and Spring semesters and when corresponding final grades are submitted for incomplete work. Students must earn the minimum semester grade point average shown below to be in good academic standing at the university. Students already on probation may be returned to good standing during summer semesters but cannot be placed on probation or suspended during summer semesters.
| Total No. of Hours Attempted at Westminster* | Minimum Semester GPA Required |
|---|---|
| 1–13 | 1.70 |
| 14–27 | 1.80 |
| 28 and above | 2.00 |
* This policy is intended to aid first-time students and does not apply to students who have been awarded transfer hours from other institutions.
Probation
Students failing to achieve good academic standing are placed on academic probation. While on academic probation, students may register for no more than 13 credit hours, may not register for an internship, and may participate in only one curricular or extracurricular activity, unless an additional activity is required for the major and is approved by the program director. Curricular activities include choir, drama, and journalism. Extracurricular activities include student government and students on academic probation are not eligible to participate in university athletics.
Students who meet semester grade point average requirements, but not cumulative grade point average requirements, may be considered for continued probationary status rather than suspension if the term grade point average shows substantial progress toward meeting all grade point average requirements. To be returned to good standing, students must have a 2.0 semester and cumulative grade point average. This applies only to Fall, Spring, and Summer semesters.
Suspension
Students who fail to earn the minimum grade point average required for good standing during a probationary semester are suspended from the university. Students may not register for any classes while suspended and must remain out of the university for one or more regular semesters. To be readmitted, students must appeal for readmission.
Academic Appeals Procedure for Readmission
Students who have been suspended must reapply for Admission to the University and will submit additional academic appeals information as part of that process. Normally, suspended students remain out of the university for one or more regular semesters; however, if students feel extenuating circumstances contributed to their failure to meet minimum grade point averages, they may choose to appeal for readmission immediately following the suspension. Students will be notified of the Appeals Committee meeting and given an opportunity to present their case to the Committee. Decisions of the Appeals Committee are final.
Admission and Retention in Academic Programs
Supplemental applications for admission and standards for retention are established by the faculties of some programs, and students may be excluded from a program for cause, as outlined in the appropriate sections of this academic catalog.
Academic Grievance Procedures
Students have the right to appeal or petition an academic decision. For the appeals procedure to be followed after suspension, see Academic Appeals Procedure for Readmission. The other appeals reside within each school. The student must make the appeal or petition, in writing, in accordance with the applicable school or program procedure. Please see the appropriate dean or program director for a copy of the procedure. Written appeals must be submitted during the first four weeks into the next semester and must include documentary evidence that the student feels has a bearing upon the request.
A faculty committee from the school involved reviews the appeal. The student may be present at the hearing. The decision of the faculty appeals committee will be reported to the student within five school days of the date of the hearing.
If the decision of the faculty committee within the school is not acceptable to the student, the student may file a written appeal to the provost within five (5) school days following notification of the faculty committee. The provost will assemble a committee, consisting of the dean of students and deans of the schools not involved to consider the appeal. All materials included in the faculty’s deliberations, including the student’s written appeal and the proceedings of the faculty hearing, are made available to this provost committee and become part of the proceedings. The hearing before the provost committee will be held within fifteen (15) school days of receipt of the written appeal. The student may be present at the provost committee hearing. The student and faculty representatives may call members of the university as supporting witnesses. The decision of the provost committee is reported to the student within five (5) school days of the date of the hearing.
Note: The individual school grievance process must happen before the grievance goes to the Provost’s office.
Decisions of the Provost's Committee are final.
Students have the right to continue their enrollment and participation in academic programs until final decisions are reached. Failure of students to file appeals within specified time limits is considered acknowledgment of the action without intent to appeal.
Academic Integrity
Westminster University is a community of learners where students, faculty, and staff gather to create and share knowledge and ideas. In an academic community, integrity is the core principle that guides our individual and shared work. Members of such a community consistently and directly acknowledge how their thoughts and products build on and incorporate the work of others. Westminster is committed to engaging students through well-developed academic programs in a supportive atmosphere. A Westminster education invites students to become lifelong learners who lead lives of consequence and responsibility. All members of the Westminster community are expected to maintain the highest standard of academic integrity and to exemplify the values of honesty, trust, fairness, respect, responsibility, and courage. These values are further defined below.
When first learning how to conduct research and incorporate sources into their academic work, students often struggle with academic writing style and correct citations. These struggles are opportunities to learn new skills and to develop self-awareness. In order to maintain academic integrity, students have a responsibility to learn the accepted practices for acknowledging their use of others’ ideas and language. Intentional and repeated breaches of academic integrity may result in serious academic consequences and even disciplinary sanctions.
Academic Misconduct Definitions
Intentional actions that violate the principle of academic integrity are referred
to as academic misconduct. Academic misconduct includes, but is not limited to, cheating,
plagiarism, helping another person cheat or plagiarize, furnishing false or misleading
information to any community member, and sharing unauthorized recordings of class
activities without explicit permission.
Cheating includes but is not limited to copying from another student’s work, using unauthorized
notes or technology, arranging for a substitute to take an exam or quiz, giving or
receiving unauthorized information prior to an exam or quiz, unauthorized collaboration
with others on an assignment, and submitting the same material for more than one class
without the authorization of the instructors.
Dishonesty includes but is not limited to fabrication of data or furnishing false or misleading
information to any faculty or staff member.
Plagiarism includes but is not limited to unauthorized use of language, art works and media,
information, or ideas generated by another person or by technology such as an AI language
model, whether directly quoted or paraphrased, without acknowledging the source. Students
must identify the sources they use in their work by using one of the generally accepted
citation methods.
Unauthorized recording and sharing of class activities includes but is not limited to the distribution, sharing, sales, or posting of recordings
on the internet (including social media) or other venue, of class content in whole
or in part, without the explicit permission of the faculty member and all enrolled
students and any guests.
Unauthorized use of AI includes but is not limited to the use of any large language model, generative models,
agentic models, or any similar technology, to substantially complete an assignment,
without the explicit prior permission of the faculty member.
All members of the university community — students, faculty, and staff — have the responsibility to report academic misconduct.
Academic Misconduct Process
Faculty are encouraged to adopt instructional and assessment methods that teach students how to use and acknowledge sources responsibly and that limit opportunities for academic misconduct. Faculty are further encouraged to include academic integrity statements in their syllabuses, to include links to the Academic Integrity Policy, and to state the course-specific consequences for academic misconduct.
When a faculty suspects that a student has engaged in academic misconduct, they should begin by considering the seriousness of the incident.
Level 1 misconduct is usually characterized by unintentional errors, assignment misunderstandings, or poor judgment when completing low-stakes assignments a Level 1 error, the faculty member may wish to provide additional instruction and should encourage the student to access support resources to help them complete assignments with academic integrity Academic consequences should be limited in scope and conduct sanctions are not recommended. There is no need to submit a report.
Level 2 misconduct is usually characterized by more deliberate violations on higher-stakes assignments. These actions often reflect a lack of full understanding of the seriousness of the behavior and of how such work would be viewed by the academic community as dishonest and inappropriate. If the student has made a level 2 error, they should meet with their professor to review how to complete assignments accurately. Academic consequences should be modest in scope though may result in a change of grade for the student. Conduct sanctions are not recommended. A report is recommended in circumstances when there is evidence of significant forethought by the student, though it is at the faculty’s discretion. The report is submitted as outlined in the Academic Misconduct Process.
Level 3 misconduct is usually characterized by pre-meditated dishonesty on medium to high stakes work. The student’s actions were intentional and they understood how to complete their work in ways the academic community would regard as honest and appropriate but knowingly chose not to do so. If the student has made a level 3 error, they should meet with their professor to review how to complete assignments with academic integrity. Academic consequences should be significant in scope. If specified in the course-specific academic integrity policy outlined in the syllabus, the student may be assigned a failing grade in the course. Conduct sanctions are not recommended for a first-time offense. A report is required and submitted as outlined in the Academic Misconduct Process.
Faculty reports of level 2 or level 3 violations are submitted to the appropriate academic dean and the Dean of Students. The report should include a copy of the assignment instructions, a copy of the portion of the work in error, and a brief explanation of how the error is in violation of expectations outlined in the assignment instructions and/or the course-specific academic integrity policy in the syllabus. The report should also detail the academic sanctions imposed and the rationale for the sanctions. In the report, faculty may recommend conduct sanctions for repeated infractions. Upon reviewing reports, a conduct officer, in consultation with appropriate academic dean(s), may recommend additional conduct sanctions that could require for the student to engage in remediation, be placed on probation or suspension, or be expelled from the University. The Dean of Students will notify the student of the remediation plan or the change in their academic status. Students may appeal such decisions following the Academic Grievance Procedures outlined in the catalog.
Academic Integrity Values
The International Center for Academic Integrity (ICAI) states that “the fundamental values of academic integrity are honesty, trust, fairness, respect, responsibility, and courage.” ICAI explains the meaning of these terms as follows:
Honesty: “Honesty begins with individuals and extends out into the larger community. As students and faculty seek knowledge, they must be honest with themselves and with each other. In study halls and laboratories, in libraries, playing fields, and classrooms, cultivating and practicing honesty lays a foundation for lifelong integrity.”
Trust: “The ability to rely on the truth of someone or something is a fundamental pillar of academic pursuit and a necessary foundation of academic work. Members of the academic community must be able to trust that work, whether student work or research, is not falsified and that standards are applied equitably to all.… Trust is reciprocal: being worthy of others’ trust and allowing oneself to trust others go hand-in-hand.”
Fairness: “All members of the academic community have a right to expect fair treatment and a duty to treat others fairly. Faculty members are fair … when they lead by example, communicating expectations clearly, responding to dishonesty consistently, and upholding academic integrity principles unfailingly. Students engage in fairness by doing their own original work, acknowledging borrowed work appropriately, respecting and upholding academic integrity policies, and by maintaining the good reputation of the institution.”
Respect: “Respect in academic communities is reciprocal and requires showing respect for oneself as well as others. Respect for self means tackling challenges without compromising your own values. Respect for others means valuing the diversity of opinions and appreciating the need to challenge, test, and refine ideas.”
Responsibility: “Upholding the values of integrity is simultaneously an individual duty and a shared concern. Every member of an academic community—each student, staff, faculty member, and administrator—is accountable to themselves and each other for safeguarding the integrity of its scholarship, teaching, research, and service.”
Courage: “Being courageous means acting in accordance with one’s convictions. Like intellectual capacity, courage can only develop in environments where it is tested. Academic communities of integrity, therefore, necessarily include opportunities to make choices, learn from them, and grow…. Only by exercising courage is it possible to create communities that are responsible, respectful, trustworthy, fair, and honest and strong enough to endure regardless of the circumstances they face.”
(International Center for Academic Integrity, “The Fundamental Values of Academic Integrity.”)
Guidance for Applying the Academic Integrity Policy
| Level | Seriousness | Examples of Student Behavior | Considerations | Academic Consequences |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | Usually characterized by unintentional errors, misunderstandings regarding assignment instructions or citation requirements, or poor and/or spontaneous judgment when completing low-stakes assignments. | Editorial errors, incomplete or improperly formatted quotations, missing or inaccurate citations, failure to appropriately acknowledge individual contributions to group work, and the submission of unauthorized AI generated material for a small portion of the assignment. | At a minimum, faculty must inform the student of the violation in writing, provide guidance on how to correct the work, and encourage the student to attend office hours or meet with a writing consultant, librarian, or tutor for support in completing assignments accurately. The student should also be informed that any repeated incidents will be escalated to a Level 2 or Level 3 offense, resulting in more serious consequences. |
Consequences should be limited. The students may be allowed to re-submit the assignment for full credit or a minor reduction in points. Faculty may choose to remove points from the specific portion of the work in question rather than to the entire assignment. Faculty may choose to give a zero score if it is a low-stakes assignment that is not likely to have any consequence on the overall grade. |
| Level 2 | Usually characterized by a failure to correct issues identified in previous work, as well as more deliberate violations on higher-stakes assignments. These actions often reflect a lack of full understanding of the seriousness of the behavior and of how such work would be viewed by the academic community as dishonest and inappropriate. | Feigning illness to avoid an exam; giving or receiving aid on quizzes, exams, papers, or other homework without specific permission from the instructor; submitting work completed in one course to satisfy an assignment in another course; minor plagiarism (one or two short excerpts of improperly cited material) or limited use of an unauthorized AI model to complete a significant portion of an assignment. | Faculty must inform the student of the violation in writing and should make a reasonable effort to converse with the student by email, online, or in person to explain the seriousness of the violation, the academic consequence and to better understand the student’s decision-making process in completing and submitting work that violates academic integrity policies. The meeting may include a third party, such as a program chair, another faculty member, or the academic dean. A Level 2 incident should be reported in accordance with the academic misconduct process when there is evidence of significant forethought, when it is determined that a student knowingly submitted dishonest or inappropriate work, when more than one incident has occurred and/or the academic consequence significantly affects the student’s grade. | Consequences should be proportional. Student may be allowed to resubmit an assignment or retake an exam for a moderately reduced grade. Student may be given a failing grade on the assignment without the opportunity to resubmit. For repeated Level 2 incidents, instructors may choose to assign a failing grade for the course. |
| Level 3 | Usually characterized by pre-meditated dishonesty on medium to high stakes work. The student’s actions were intentional, they recognized the seriousness of their actions, and they understood how to complete their work in ways the academic community would regard as honest and appropriate though knowingly chose not to do so. | Buying, selling, or providing a paper or a copy of an exam; having someone else take an exam or taking an exam for someone else; leaving the screen of an online exam before submission; using hidden notes or other unauthorized materials during an exam; possessing and/or using a cell phone, calculator, other device, using AI when not permitted; using internet resources when not permitted; sabotaging someone else’s work; altering or forging documents or identities; changing the letter or numerical grade on an exam or assignment after the instructor has assigned the final grade; multiple instances of plagiarism in one assignment or across several assignments. |
Faculty must inform the student of the violation in writing and should make a reasonable effort to converse with the student by email, online, or in person to explain the seriousness of the violation and the academic consequence. The meeting may include a third party, such as a program chair, another faculty member, or the academic dean. A Level 3 incident must be reported in accordance with the academic misconduct process. |
Consequences should be significant with severe penalties. The student should earn a failing grade on the assignment with no opportunity to resubmit. Students may earn a failing grade in the course. In serious cases, faculty may recommend to the Dean of Students that the student be placed on probation, suspended, or expelled. |